Conversation
- Introduced new community projects: SPARC, Memory Bank, Tips & Tricks, Dynamic Rules, and Roo Commander. - Added detailed documentation for various custom modes including Advanced Orchestrator, Documentation Writer, Jest Test Engineer, Junior Developer Code Reviewer, Senior Developer Code Reviewer, User Story Creator, VibeMode, and ResearchMode. - Created an index page for community projects and a gallery for custom modes. - Updated sidebar navigation to reflect new structure and improve accessibility to community resources. - Ensured backward compatibility for existing links to custom modes gallery.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:XL
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed everything up to c30676c in 2 minutes and 32 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
689lines of code in18files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
34draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. docs/community/custom-modes/advanced-orchestrator.md:28
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a final newline at the end of the file for consistency and POSIX compliance. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =20%<= threshold50%The comment suggests adding a final newline for consistency and POSIX compliance. While this is a good practice, it is more of an informative comment rather than a specific code suggestion or a request for a test. It doesn't align with the rules provided, which focus on actionable feedback or specific code improvements.
2. docs/community/custom-modes/documentation-writer.md:18
- Draft comment:
File appears to be missing a final newline. Please add one for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is about adding a final newline for consistency. This is a code style issue, which is generally covered by tools like ESLint and Prettier. According to the rules, ESLint and Prettier should be set up to enforce code style rules automatically. Therefore, this comment is not necessary as it should be handled by the automated tools.
3. docs/community/custom-modes/jest-test-engineer.md:22
- Draft comment:
Add a trailing newline at the end of the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking for a trailing newline at the end of the file, which is a common code style requirement. However, it doesn't provide any specific guidance or suggestion related to the code's functionality or logic. It seems to be more of a stylistic preference, which might be covered by tools like ESLint or Prettier. According to the rules, purely informative comments should be removed, and this comment falls into that category.
4. docs/community/custom-modes/junior-developer-code-reviewer.md:24
- Draft comment:
Include a final newline at the file's end to maintain formatting consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is purely informative and does not provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a test to be written. It also does not relate to any of the additional rules provided.
5. docs/community/custom-modes/orchestrator.md:18
- Draft comment:
Please add a trailing newline at the end of the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While having trailing newlines is generally considered good practice and part of many style guides including Airbnb's, this kind of formatting issue should be handled automatically by ESLint/Prettier rather than through manual code review comments. Our rules specifically state that we should have ESLint and Prettier set up to handle code style rules automatically. The comment is technically correct - trailing newlines are good practice. And this is a real change in a new file. However, this is exactly the kind of formatting issue that should be handled by automated tools rather than manual review comments. Our standards explicitly state that ESLint and Prettier should handle code style rules. The comment should be removed since formatting issues like trailing newlines should be handled by automated tools rather than manual review comments.
6. docs/community/custom-modes/research-mode.md:21
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a newline at the end of the file for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =20%<= threshold50%The comment is suggesting a minor style change that doesn't impact functionality or readability significantly. It doesn't align with the rules provided, which focus on more substantial code quality and functionality issues.
7. docs/community/custom-modes/senior-developer-code-reviewer.md:24
- Draft comment:
A final newline at the end would improve consistency; please add one. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =20%<= threshold50%The comment is suggesting a minor style change that doesn't impact functionality or readability significantly. It doesn't align with the rules provided, which focus on more substantial issues like code structure, error handling, and testing.
8. docs/community/custom-modes/user-story-creator.md:18
- Draft comment:
Please append a final newline to the file for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking for a final newline to be added to the file for consistency. This is a code style issue, which is generally covered by tools like ESLint and Prettier. According to the rules, ESLint and Prettier should be set up to enforce code style rules automatically. Therefore, this comment is unnecessary as it should be handled by the automated tools.
9. docs/community/custom-modes/vibe-mode.md:20
- Draft comment:
Add a trailing newline at the end of the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement. It violates the rule of not making purely informative comments.
10. docs/community/dynamic-rules.md:5
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a final newline to the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement. It does not align with the rules provided, which focus on actionable feedback and code quality improvements.
11. docs/community/index.md:31
- Draft comment:
A final newline at the end of this file would help maintain consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is purely informative and does not provide a specific code suggestion or highlight a potential issue. It does not align with the rules for useful comments.
12. docs/community/memory-bank.md:11
- Draft comment:
Please add a newline at the end of the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =30%<= threshold50%The comment is asking for a newline at the end of the file, which is a common code style requirement. However, it doesn't align with the specific rules provided, as it doesn't relate to the more critical aspects of code quality or functionality. It is more of a stylistic preference, which is not covered by the rules.
13. docs/community/roo-commander.md:5
- Draft comment:
Add a trailing newline at the end of this file for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While having trailing newlines is a common convention and good practice, this kind of formatting issue should be handled automatically by ESLint/Prettier which are required by our development standards. Making manual comments about formatting is not valuable since these should be automated. The comment is technically correct about a real formatting issue. Having trailing newlines is important for git diffs and file handling in Unix-like systems. While the formatting issue is real, our standards explicitly state that ESLint and Prettier should be set up to handle code style rules automatically. Making manual comments about formatting is redundant and adds noise to the review. The comment should be deleted since formatting issues should be handled by automated tools rather than manual review comments.
14. docs/community/sparc.md:23
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a newline at the end of the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement. It does not align with the rules provided, which discourage purely informative comments.
15. docs/community/tips-and-tricks.md:5
- Draft comment:
Please add a final newline at the end of the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While having a trailing newline is a good practice, this kind of formatting issue should be handled automatically by tools like ESLint/Prettier which are required by our standards. Making manual comments about formatting is explicitly discouraged by our rules. These tools should be configured to automatically fix such issues. The comment is technically correct - files should end with newlines. And it's about changed code since this is a new file. However, our rules explicitly state that we should not comment on things that should be caught by automated tools. This is exactly the kind of thing that Prettier would fix automatically. The comment should be deleted since formatting issues should be handled by automated tools rather than manual review comments.
16. docs/features/custom-modes.md:372
- Draft comment:
For consistency with other documentation files, consider adding a final newline. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
17. sidebars.ts:422
- Draft comment:
Sidebars updated to reflect the new community structure; consider running ESLint/Prettier to ensure consistent formatting, including a trailing newline. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
18. docs/community/custom-modes/advanced-orchestrator.md:28
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a trailing newline at the end of the file to conform with our style guidelines. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
19. docs/community/custom-modes/documentation-writer.md:18
- Draft comment:
Add a trailing newline at the end of the file for consistency with project standards. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
20. docs/community/custom-modes/jest-test-engineer.md:22
- Draft comment:
Ensure a trailing newline at the end of the file to meet our formatting guidelines. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
21. docs/community/custom-modes/junior-developer-code-reviewer.md:24
- Draft comment:
Please add a trailing newline at the end of the file for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
22. docs/community/custom-modes/orchestrator.md:18
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a trailing newline at the end of this file to adhere to our style guidelines. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
23. docs/community/custom-modes/research-mode.md:21
- Draft comment:
A trailing newline at the end of the file is recommended for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
24. docs/community/custom-modes/senior-developer-code-reviewer.md:24
- Draft comment:
Add a trailing newline at the end of the file to comply with our coding standards. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
25. docs/community/custom-modes/user-story-creator.md:18
- Draft comment:
Please add a trailing newline at the end of the file for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
26. docs/community/custom-modes/vibe-mode.md:20
- Draft comment:
Consider inserting a trailing newline at the end of the file to meet our style guidelines. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
27. docs/community/dynamic-rules.md:5
- Draft comment:
If not already present, please add a trailing newline at the end of the file for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
28. sidebars.ts:148
- Draft comment:
Verify that the 'Custom Modes Gallery' links match the updated file paths and naming conventions from the recent additions. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
29. docs/community/custom-modes/advanced-orchestrator.md:25
- Draft comment:
Typographical issue: The regex pattern contains 'cline_custom_modes.json'. Please verify if this is the intended file name or if it should be corrected (e.g., 'client_custom_modes.json'). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% Without more context about the codebase, I cannot be certain whether 'cline_custom_modes.json' is actually incorrect. The file could intentionally be named 'cline_' rather than 'client_'. Making assumptions about filenames without full context could lead to incorrect changes. The comment is also phrased as a verification request ("Please verify if...") which violates our rules about not asking authors to verify things. The filename could actually be intentionally named 'cline_' for a reason I'm not aware of. Making assumptions about naming without full context is dangerous. The comment is speculative and asks for verification rather than making a clear assertion about a definite issue. This violates our review rules. The comment should be deleted because it makes assumptions without sufficient context and asks for verification rather than pointing out a definite issue.
30. docs/community/custom-modes/jest-test-engineer.md:22
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a newline at the end of the file to adhere to common file formatting conventions. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is purely informative and does not provide any specific code suggestion or highlight a potential issue. It simply suggests adding a newline for formatting, which is not critical to the functionality or readability of the code.
31. docs/community/custom-modes/junior-developer-code-reviewer.md:24
- Draft comment:
The file is missing a newline at the end. While this is a trivial formatting issue, it's good practice to end files with a newline to ensure compatibility with various tools. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is technically correct, our rules state "Do NOT make comments that are obvious or unimportant." Missing newlines at end of file are typically handled automatically by editors and linters. This is a very minor formatting issue that doesn't affect functionality. The rules also emphasize focusing on more substantial issues. The missing newline could cause issues with some tools and is considered a standard best practice. Maybe this is worth mentioning to junior developers? While it's a valid best practice, this is exactly the kind of minor formatting issue that should be handled by automated tools like ESLint/Prettier rather than manual review comments. Delete this comment. This kind of minor formatting issue should be handled by automated tooling rather than manual review comments.
32. docs/community/dynamic-rules.md:5
- Draft comment:
Trivial: The file is missing a newline at the end. Please add an empty newline at the end of the file for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% According to our rules, we should not comment on things that should be handled by automated tools. Missing newlines at end of files are exactly the kind of thing that ESLint and Prettier automatically fix. Additionally, this is a very minor formatting issue that doesn't affect functionality. Maybe having consistent file endings is important for version control systems and some tools, so this could be a valid concern. While file endings are important, this is precisely why we have automated tools like ESLint/Prettier to handle such formatting concerns automatically. Our rules explicitly state to let these tools handle such issues. The comment should be deleted as it addresses a formatting issue that should be handled by automated tools rather than manual review comments.
33. docs/community/dynamic-rules.md:5
- Draft comment:
Minor: Consider hyphenating 'project specific rules' to 'project-specific rules' on line 5 to clarify that the rules are specific to the project. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The rules state not to make purely informative comments or comments that are obvious/unimportant. This is a minor grammatical suggestion that doesn't impact code functionality or quality. Documentation style/grammar issues are not mentioned in the priority rules. The change is not critical for understanding. Perhaps proper hyphenation could be considered important for documentation clarity and professionalism? Some style guides do emphasize proper hyphenation. While proper grammar is good, this is an extremely minor stylistic issue that doesn't meaningfully impact documentation clarity or usability. The rules emphasize focusing on substantial code quality issues. This comment should be removed as it's a minor grammatical suggestion that doesn't align with the focus on substantial code quality issues outlined in the review rules.
34. docs/community/sparc.md:10
- Draft comment:
Consider replacing 'sub directories' with 'subdirectories' for consistency and adherence to standard spelling. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While "subdirectories" is indeed the more common spelling, this is a minor formatting issue in documentation. The meaning is perfectly clear either way. According to our rules, we should not make purely informative comments or comments about obvious/unimportant issues. This seems to fall into that category. The consistent spelling could make the documentation look more professional. Technical documentation often benefits from standardized terminology. While consistency is good, this is too minor of an issue to warrant a PR comment. It doesn't affect functionality or understanding. Delete this comment as it's too minor and purely stylistic, not affecting the actual functionality or clarity of the documentation.
Workflow ID: wflow_cL7wRet2xTCG6Akg
You can customize 
| "customInstructions": "Your role is to coordinate complex workflows by delegating tasks to specialized modes. As an orchestrator, you should:\n\n1. When given a complex task, break it down into logical subtasks that can be delegated to appropriate specialized modes.\n\n2. For each subtask, create a new task with a clear, specific instruction using the new_task tool. Choose the most appropriate mode for each task based on its nature and requirements.\n\n3. Track and manage the progress of all subtasks. When a subtask is completed, analyze its results and determine the next steps.\n\n4. Help the user understand how the different subtasks fit together in the overall workflow. Provide clear reasoning about why you're delegating specific tasks to specific modes.\n\n5. When all subtasks are completed, synthesize the results and provide a comprehensive overview of what was accomplished.\n\n6. You can also manage custom modes by editing custom_modes.json and .roomodes files directly. This allows you to create, modify, or delete custom modes as part of your orchestration capabilities.\n\n7. Ask clarifying questions when necessary to better understand how to break down complex tasks effectively.\n\n8. Suggest improvements to the workflow based on the results of completed subtasks.", | ||
| "groups": [ | ||
| "read", | ||
| ["edit", { "fileRegex": "\\.roomodes$|cline_custom_modes\\.json$", "description": "Mode configuration files only" }] |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typographical error: In the fileRegex for mode configurations, 'cline_custom_modes.json' appears to be a typo. It should likely be 'custom_modes.json'. Please verify and correct.
Suggested change
| ["edit", { "fileRegex": "\\.roomodes$|cline_custom_modes\\.json$", "description": "Mode configuration files only" }] | |
| ["edit", { "fileRegex": "\\.roomodes$|custom_modes\\.json$", "description": "Mode configuration files only" }] |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Important
Restructures community documentation by deleting
community.md, creating individual markdown files for projects and modes, and updating the sidebar configuration.community.mdand creates individual markdown files for each community project and custom mode.index.mdto serve as the new entry point for community documentation.features/custom-modes.mdto link to the new community gallery location.sidebars.tsto reflect new documentation structure, adding categories for "Projects" and "Custom Modes Gallery".This description was created by
for c30676c. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.